Informed Consent: Understanding Manufactured Consent through Trauma-based Mind Control
I was on Twitter this morning.
Yes, I should know better. There seems to be this belief that the USA was founded on the principle of being emotionally validated. Um… no. That is not the law, but someone tried to argue that point with me anyway.
When people want validation for their psychological, historical, or ideological perspective, then we have to compare it to a litmus test. Is it: “an ideology not native to a person/culture for the expressed political aim of divide and conquer."
Let’s look at the last twenty-five years in the United States. What ideas have muscled their way into the classroom that are foreign concepts and inappropriate for the K-12 age range?
I can name a few:
Social Emotional Learning
Gender Ideology
Critical Race Theory
Global Warming/Climate Change
Activism
Marxism/Socialism
Aztlan Mythology
Covid Restrictions and Mandates
Why are these an issue?
Anyone who understands childhood and adolescent behavior knows perfectly well why these provocative topics are taboo for children in K-12. As a matter of understood and accepted biological development, children do not have the brain capacity to analyze, comprehend, or identify nuisances, compare/contrast abstractions, or real life experiences. That is why children are not held to the same culpability standards as adults are in our legal system. Children do not understand permanency to their actions.
Another reason why parents are in charge of their families instead of complete strangers: children are empty vessels and only mature, responsible people who have their best interest at heart should be in charge of them. Governments don’t have that benign capacity, as we have observed throughout history. Nor do people or organizations with political aims have a neutral outlook into the raising of children.
The only reason to insert complex ideas into the psychology of a defenseless child is for the inherent brainwashing effects and, dare I saw: advantages. I grew up when my parents were discussing the statement of a Catholic Priest: “If I can get a child before the age of seven into the Church, that child will be a lifelong Catholic.” It’s a paraphrase, but a very telling one.
Do humans have a belief factor expiration date? Are we what we are created? Nature versus nurture? Or is it; nurture versus nature?
These philosophical questions have plagued humankind for centuries. Or, have they? Perhaps the public has been kept in the dark about the true nature of the human psyche in order to exploit our naïveté.
Is that the reason currencies are devalued so that two incomes are necessary to live a comfortable life? Extract both parents from the scene, and their children are now at the mercy of strangers, be it in the childcare industry or the educational system. Is it paranoia to suggest such? Or, can we see this process being played out in our current events?
How do we validate realism in our history and culture without falling victim to victimhood?
Well, if you want to teach Black History, then you have to teach all of it. You cannot just cherry-pick what supports your thesis statement of either: USA good or USA bad. When you place that topic into context, which is a gray area, then a mature, adult mind has to be present in order to comprehend the subject from top to bottom.
Facts like: the first free person to own a black slave in North America was a black man. How about: warring tribes in Africa sold off their conquered foes to slavers ships. And today: Africa still has economic ties with the slave trade, where the “white” nations have outlawed it.
Should we cancel all things African, then? Or, how about the residents of the continent? Every nation? Religion? The subject is not black and white, clear-cut as the promulgators would like you to believe.
So, are you teaching all the known history? Or, only that which condemns or creates whatever psychological schema you are looking for in the end result of your teaching? Just so you know, that makes you a facilitator, not a teacher, if you have a political end result for which you would like to achieve.
That is where the uproar in the curriculum that parents are concerned with enters the national stage. Because when you create an illusion (non-reality) and support that illusion, you are in fact a psychological and emotional abuser. With children, that is called: child abuse.
In the context with psychological and medical standards, you have created insanity in someone. That is Nazi-era level medical experimentation that is illegal under International Law (Nuremberg Code). Adults must have informed consent. Not to mention, that the USA frowns on such conduct as well, that is why we have laws protecting children.
So, what do you believe versus what you know?
You can never have informed consent when psychological and emotional abuse like Trauma-based Mind Control is in effect. We are supposed to have free will. Are you free to decide, with all the known facts and figures? Or, is your reality curated, so you believe one social schema with little research, support, or speech from any opposing viewpoint?
Trauma-based Mind Control does one of two things: creates an acolyte for one narrative, or produces someone who cannot make a decision, so external forces (politicians/media) make decisions for them.
What trauma have you endured so that your perspective is slanted to one side without all the knowledge to make an informed decision? Or, are you paralyzed from making a decision, so you go along to get along?
Trauma-based Mind Control in essence is: If you don’t do/believe X, then Y will happen. Two choices with no third option. You have been herded into a classical Hegelian structure: problem, reaction, solution.
The Earth is going to boil over! You must give up all your rights to food, medicine, electricity, and fossil fuels or the Earth will die!
I have degrees stemming from my college courses in biology, geology, and geography. The Earth is not going to boil over. Fossil fuels and carbon have no effect on climate or weather. The sun is the creator of our storms and weather. The moon shifts our tides. Anything else that makes someone believe that the Earth and all life on the planet is doomed is nothing but an extremist, who is psychologically and emotionally blackmailing others via trauma to induce/manipulate people for their manufactured consent.
Do you understand these concepts? Can you name any other ideas that fit this profile of either or? Life or death? Heaven or hell?
If not, then you may be under someone’s psychological/emotional abuse model.
If so, then there might be hope for humanity yet.